Which parties' preferences are typically considered in determining venue when multiple proper venues exist?

In cases where multiple proper venues exist, the preferences of the plaintiffs are generally afforded deference. This approach recognizes the plaintiffs' choice of venue as significant because they are the ones initiating the lawsuit and often have logistical and strategic reasons for choosing a particular location. Their preferences may relate to factors such as convenience, familiarity with the court, and the perceived likelihood of a favorable jury.

While defendants do have some ability to challenge venue on specific grounds, the plaintiff's choice is typically respected unless there are compelling reasons to transfer the case to a different venue. This principle ensures that plaintiffs are not unduly restricted in where they can bring their claims. In essence, the legal system acknowledges that the plaintiffs, as the aggrieved parties, should have a say in the forum where their grievances are adjudicated.