What defense motion should a defendant file regarding evidence obtained during a traffic stop for speeding?

The defendant should file a motion to suppress the evidence obtained during the traffic stop for speeding because this motion directly challenges the legality of how that evidence was acquired. If the evidence was obtained during a stop that lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause, the defendant can argue that the evidence should not be admissible in court. The motion to suppress allows the court to evaluate whether the officer had the authority to initiate the stop and whether the subsequent search or seizure followed lawful procedures.

In cases involving traffic stops, if there are concerns about the legality of the stop itself or any searches that occurred, a motion to suppress is the appropriate legal tool. This motion focuses on protecting the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures, ensuring that only evidence obtained through constitutionally permissible means is allowed in court.

The other motions listed do not directly address the issue of the evidence obtained during the traffic stop. A motion to dismiss would seek to terminate the case entirely, which is not the right approach if the defendant wishes to contest specific evidence. A motion for acquittal is used after the prosecution has presented its case, aimed at asserting that the evidence is insufficient for a conviction. Finally, a motion for a change of venue pertains to the location of the trial and is unrelated